[MAIPC] MAIPC Digest, Vol 65, Issue 3 -Message 2
Kathryn Peterson-Lambert
triplam747 at aol.com
Tue Mar 7 05:48:49 PST 2017
Hello and great point regarding chemical resistance - this is a biological process that is present everywhere - in my IPM classes that I had with Mark and also in Pennsylvania - it was suggested that rotating the use of chemicals would alleviate some of this resistance - it is similar to the antibiotic resistance that humans develop to bacteria - using the products correctly and not abusing them also helps - much like the IPM - Mark suggested using a lower dosage on the conservative side to treat problems - rather than too much. This combined with a rotation of chemicals and without a sole reliance on the chemicals. Mechanical, biological, other methods are available - once a chemical has not been used for three years or so - then the plants after so many generations of growth may respond to the chemical again.
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:43 PM, maipc-request at lists.maipc.org wrote:
>
> Send MAIPC mailing list submissions to
> maipc at lists.maipc.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> maipc-request at lists.maipc.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> maipc-owner at lists.maipc.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MAIPC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. 2 upcoming meetings + Faith's blog about inv spp intro rates
> (Phytodoer at aol.com)
> 2. Invasive Management as a Selection Pressure (frazmo)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:03:43 -0500
> From: Phytodoer at aol.com
> To: necis at lists.nationalwildlife.org, ficmnew at ls.ars.usda.gov,
> maipc at lists.maipc.org
> Subject: [MAIPC] 2 upcoming meetings + Faith's blog about inv spp
> intro rates
> Message-ID: <1983feb.235d5b14.45eee25e at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello,
> forest pest mavens & others
>
> I have posted a blog at _www.cisp.us_ (http://www.cisp.us) or
> _www.nivemnic.us_ (http://www.nivemnic.us) that reports on the Hanno Seebens & 40+
> colleagues - showing that introductions of invasive species continued to rise
> in the 20th Century & first years of the 21st ... policies are not yet
> adequately effective in turning back this tidal wave ...
>
> 2 meetings in May provide opportunity to join others working on these
> problems.
>
> 1) The North American Invasive Species Forum - which meets every other year
> - is meeting in Savannah, GA on May 9 - 11. I hope this meeting will help
> bridge the gap between "invasive species" activists and official
> "phytosanitary" types. The agenda and registration information is at
> http://www.invasivespecies2017.org/
>
> 2) IUFRO section on Foliage, shoot and stem diseases of forest trees will
> be in Niagara Falls, Ontario on May 7-11, 2017. This year?s meeting theme:
> Invasive Forest Pathogens & Implications for Biology and Policy. Details
> are at https://www.cif-ifc.org/iufroworkingparty2017/
>
> Wish I could go to both!
>
> Faith Campbell
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20170306/f30715ea/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:09:38 -0500
> From: frazmo <frazmo at gmail.com>
> To: "maipc at lists.maipc.org" <maipc at lists.maipc.org>
> Subject: [MAIPC] Invasive Management as a Selection Pressure
> Message-ID:
> <CAOO+nP-_XmaoR=nJmKOdZxuS+nhuxZfjwa9o0KjQg1EW7iRKJw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> It?s well known that pesticide use can cause the development of chemical
> resistance in target insects and plants. Based on anecdotal information and
> personal observations, non-chemical invasive plant control efforts appear
> to be able to cause the development of ?resistance-like? adaptations in
> plants. When we engage in sustained management activity on an invasive
> plant at a site, we can create selection pressure on the plant. Unwittingly
> we may serve like plant breeders trying to create desirable new varieties,
> but creating undesirable new varieties that could become more challenging
> to manage.
>
> Several examples. These are based on anecdotes and personal observations,
> and I am hoping that perhaps some folks will be inspired to gather data and
> study this more closely. When Japanese Stiltgrass invades a frequently
> mowed area like a managed lawn, I have seen reports that it adapts to
> flower and set seed even in the face of the mowing. I have noted that as we
> have intensified efforts to control Garlic Mustard by hand pulling, it may
> be adapting by flowering and developing viable seed earlier, in advance of
> when we have tended to focus our pulling efforts. (I realize that a
> confounding factor here is our increasing warming trend.) Also, I think I?m
> seeing signs that we are selecting out the tallest, most robust plants, and
> seeing more ?stunted? plants that may be harder to spot, yet still produce
> seeds. Upper parts of plants may detach more readily leaving viable roots
> behind, and un-pulled plants may have a second bloom later in the season.
>
> Finally, over twenty-plus years of pulling English Ivy at Long Branch
> Nature Center in Arlington, Virginia, I have noticed recently that more of
> the remaining ivy seems to have a new characteristic. The vines seem to be
> more fragile. Before, most vines pulled up very cooperatively, leaving few
> rooted stem fragments. Now I find more uncooperative vines that go to
> pieces on me, creating more work to find and pull all the viable remnants.
> I believe that we?ve inadvertently selected for this trait.
>
> In closing, my key point is that we in the invasive plants community should
> be conscious of the possibility that we are selecting for resistant traits.
> We should monitor for signs and consider changing up our practices
> occasionally to reduce the risk of developing non-chemical resistance.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve Young, Volunteer, Arlington VA (past MAIPC Treasurer)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20170306/68d7c869/attachment-0001.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> MAIPC mailing list
> MAIPC at lists.maipc.org
> http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of MAIPC Digest, Vol 65, Issue 3
> ************************************
More information about the MAIPC
mailing list