[MAIPC] fig buttercup

Mon Apr 23 08:33:02 PDT 2018

This is a fantastic idea for a biocontrol project.  I'm located at the very northern reach of Fig Buttercup in New York and I'm trying to get more surveying done this spring while the opportunity is there.  For folks in more heavily infested areas, especially at northern latitudes, do you have advice on the timing for these surveys?  Here in the Capital Region this is at the moment an ED/RR scenario, it seems that it is more likely to be located along the Hudson River corridor from the few reports that we do have.

Spencer Barrett

Terrestrial Coordinator, Capital-Mohawk PRISM

________________________________
From: MAIPC <maipc-bounces at lists.maipc.org> on behalf of Marc Imlay <ialm at erols.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 8:24:18 AM
To: 'MNPS Board'; Bruckart, William; INVASIVES at LISTSERV.UMD.EDU; maipc at lists.maipc.org; apwg at lists.plantconservation.org
Cc: Garrett, Chris; DaSilva, Calvin; Dolesh, Mike; Simmonds, Tanya; Lee, Jill; Westby, Brooke; Mills, Devin; Abrams, Amanda; MacGregor, Ashlyn; Abellera, Jon Paolo; reginald.lea at pgcps.org; 'Karen Ogden'; Dillon, John; Adams, Michelle; Harley, George; Sweet, Benjamin
Subject: [MAIPC] fig buttercup

Here is an Earth day contribution from Karen and myself. Marc

From: Marc Imlay [mailto:ialm at erols.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 7:23 AM
To: James, Rosalind <Rosalind.James at ARS.USDA.GOV<mailto:Rosalind.James at ARS.USDA.GOV>>; 'Robyn.I.Rose at aphis.usda.gov' <Robyn.I.Rose at aphis.usda.gov<mailto:Robyn.I.Rose at aphis.usda.gov>>
Subject: fig buttercup

Robyn Rose

United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Plant Protection and Quarantine Program
4700 River Road Riverdale, MD 20737

April 24, 2018

Dear Robyn,

The Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club respectfully requests that the Biological Control Program investigate an effective host specific, pathogenic biological control of Fig Buttercup (Lesser Celandine)(Ranunculus ficaria also known as Ficaria verna Huds)  It is our position that this research has could provide the means to substantially reduce damage, particularly to threatened species, by this invasive species.

A 2015 weed risk assessment conducted by the Maryland Department of Agriculture (MDA) describes fig buttercup as a High Risk species and suggests that the collection of additional information could move the risk score further into the high risk region. A significant invasive in the United States, R. ficaria readily spreads in moist sites forming extensive and dense mats outcompeting plants in natural systems (MDA,  2015. Retrieved from http://mda.maryland.gov/plants-pests/Documents/Ficaria_verna_ WRA%20061715.pdf<http://mda.maryland.gov/plants-pests/Documents/Ficaria_verna_%20WRA%20061715.pdf>).

The scope of this research would include first, the investigation of population controls of native European sites that exhibit typical densities.  Such research would take into account that multiple factors or mechanisms may in fact keep bulb regeneration in check. Once probable mechanisms were identified, a protocol would be developed to evaluate artificial treatments, such as inoculation with one or more pathogens. This preliminary work would simplify the selection of a U.S. test species and could make more efficient, the evaluation of risks to non-target North American species. Alternatively, the same approach could be applied to related, North American species.

Understanding the mission of the Biological Control Program is to “work with cooperators to import, screen, develop, release, implement, monitor, and transfer biological control technologies to prevent the establishment, slow the spread, and manage pests of significant economic, environmental or regulatory importance…” we respectfully request that such an effort begin for the biological control of Fig Buttercup (Lesser Celandine). Specifically, we would hope to see the study of entomological and pathological controls of native populations to learn how spread is constrained.

We sincerely appreciate your consideration of our request. We have made the same request to your colleagues at Crop Production and Protection, ARS with the hope that funding might be more readily secured through a joint request. A knowledgeable point of contact for this matter is Marc Imlay who can be reached 301-442-5657 or email at ialm at erols.com<mailto:ialm at erols.com>.

Best regards,

Maryland Chapter, The Sierra Club

7338 Baltimore Ave #102,

College Park, MD 20740

Marc Imlay

Sierra Club Natural Places Chapter Chair working group

Rosalind James
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Protection

5601 Sunnyside Avenue Mailstop 5139 GWCC-BLTSVL

Beltsville MD 20705

April 24, 2018

Dear Rosalind,

The Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club respectfully requests that the Biological Control Program investigate an effective host specific, pathogenic biological control of Fig Buttercup (Lesser Celandine) (Ranunculus ficaria also known as Ficaria verna Huds)  It is our position that this research has could provide the means to substantially reduce damage, particularly to threatened species, by this invasive species.

A 2015 weed risk assessment conducted by the Maryland Department of Agriculture (MDA) describes fig buttercup as a High Risk species and suggests that the collection of additional information could move the risk score further into the high risk region. A significant invasive in the United States, R. ficaria readily spreads in moist sites forming extensive and dense mats outcompeting plants in natural systems (MDA,  2015. Retrieved from http://mda.maryland.gov/plants-pests/Documents/Ficaria_verna_ WRA%20061715.pdf<http://mda.maryland.gov/plants-pests/Documents/Ficaria_verna_%20WRA%20061715.pdf>).

The scope of the proposed research would include first, the investigation of population controls of native European sites that exhibit typical densities.  Such research would take into account that multiple factors or mechanisms may in fact keep bulb regeneration in check. Once probable mechanisms were identified, a protocol would be developed to evaluate artificial treatments, such as inoculation with one or more pathogens. This preliminary work would simplify the selection of a U.S. test species and could make more efficient the evaluation of risks to non-target North American species. Alternatively, the same approach could be applied to related, North American species.

Understanding that Crop Production and Protection (CPP) National Programs endeavor to deliver science-based information, genetic resources, and technologies for protection from plant diseases and pests, we respectfully request that such an effort begin for the biological control of Fig Buttercup (Lesser Celandine). Specifically, we would hope to see the study of entomological and pathological controls of native populations to learn how spread is constrained.

We sincerely appreciate your consideration of our request. We have made the same request to your colleagues at the Biological Controls Program, PPQ, APHIS hoping funding might be more readily secured through a joint request. A knowledgeable point of contact for this matter is Marc Imlay who can be reached by phone at 301-442-5657 or email at ialm at erols.com<mailto:ialm at erols.com>.

Best Regards,

Maryland Chapter, The Sierra Club

7338 Baltimore Ave #102,

College Park, MD 20740

Marc Imlay

Sierra Club Natural Places Chapter Chair working group

[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>        Virus-free. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20180423/d7d15cfd/attachment-0001.html>