[MAIPC] MAIPC Digest, Vol 119, Issue 4

Pia van de Venne pia.parkprotector at gmail.com
Sun Sep 5 20:57:53 PDT 2021


Hello, referring to plant natives from other states in locations of
eradicated invasives, how about robust plants that are right in our area,
already growing close or next to the invasives.
I transplant dozens of small golden ragworts and striped white violets.
This violata striata is extremely easy to transplant; it was taking over
our entire lawn and now, in a different area I am pulling out the
ground ivy and planting violets. Ground ivy is terrible.
Along shady park roadsides I have planted golden ragwort, violets, and some
path rush. I notice more ferns growing in those areas too.
Pia van de Venne, Murrysville PA


On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 4:15 PM <maipc-request at lists.maipc.org> wrote:

> Send MAIPC mailing list submissions to
>         maipc at lists.maipc.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         maipc-request at lists.maipc.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         maipc-owner at lists.maipc.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MAIPC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Intriguing new research: Coevolution between invasive and
>       native species (Kathy Daniel)
>    2. Re: Intriguing new research: Coevolution between invasive and
>       native species (Nathan Hartshorne)
>    3. Re: Intriguing new research: Coevolution between invasive and
>       native species (Stephen Hiltner)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 06:25:27 -0400
> From: Kathy Daniel <kdaniel20816 at gmail.com>
> To: "MAIPC Listserve (maipc at lists.maipc.org)" <maipc at lists.maipc.org>
> Subject: [MAIPC] Intriguing new research: Coevolution between invasive
>         and native species
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAOxDgQD9LfvGobeKqqmEutPY5gyo35fQjTL_oq6qQnzEUd7Jig at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> https://news.uga.edu/coevolution-between-invasive-native-species-062812/
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20210903/bf0fcf07/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:37:17 -0400
> From: Nathan Hartshorne <nshartshorne at gmail.com>
> To: Kathy Daniel <kdaniel20816 at gmail.com>
> Cc: "MAIPC Listserve (maipc at lists.maipc.org)" <maipc at lists.maipc.org>
> Subject: Re: [MAIPC] Intriguing new research: Coevolution between
>         invasive and native species
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAOWHdwB1K5KM5K+7z-FHfsfXSq5F4juky4RqOYY9xZT7PD0+HA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> " He explained that removing invasive species and replanting natives often
> results in failure but replacing invasive species with native plants from
> an area where the plants have had time to adapt to the invader could be
> more effective. Rather than replanting clearweed from a recently invaded
> site in Michigan, for example, land managers could use plants from New York
> that are more likely to be resistant to garlic mustard."
>
> It certainly gives us a lot to think about in terms of wildlife
> management.  At the same time, we wouldn't want to shrink the genetics of a
> species, but there might be a balance.
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:26 AM Kathy Daniel <kdaniel20816 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > https://news.uga.edu/coevolution-between-invasive-native-species-062812/
> > _______________________________________________
> > MAIPC mailing list
> > MAIPC at lists.maipc.org
> > http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20210903/86099fdc/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 09:33:56 -0400
> From: Stephen Hiltner <stevehiltner at gmail.com>
> To: Nathan Hartshorne <nshartshorne at gmail.com>
> Cc: Kathy Daniel <kdaniel20816 at gmail.com>,  "MAIPC Listserve
>         (maipc at lists.maipc.org)" <maipc at lists.maipc.org>
> Subject: Re: [MAIPC] Intriguing new research: Coevolution between
>         invasive and native species
> Message-ID:
>         <CABrwChoCo6s2D5LoUZsm-Rnr9Z_-Z35daRWo4-LT7R=
> cJ1hVTg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks for sharing this article. FYI: There's a book called Inheritors of
> the Earth that claims to be optimistic because nature might heal itself in
> a million years. It claims that conservation efforts are doomed to failure,
> so we should embrace the change. I wrote a review <http://rdcu.be/HSal>
> for
> Biological Invasions.
>
> It would be strange to go to the trouble of replanting if one is assuming
> the garlic mustard will simply recolonize. We've had good luck at our
> preserve with removing garlic mustard before it goes to seed. We're
> basically playing the role we wish deer would play. Persistence furthers if
> one's means are in balance with the scope of the problem. Glad to hear,
> though, of evidence of some coevolution.
>
> Steve
> PrincetonNatureNotes.org
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:15 AM Nathan Hartshorne <nshartshorne at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > " He explained that removing invasive species and replanting natives
> > often results in failure but replacing invasive species with native
> plants
> > from an area where the plants have had time to adapt to the invader could
> > be more effective. Rather than replanting clearweed from a recently
> invaded
> > site in Michigan, for example, land managers could use plants from New
> York
> > that are more likely to be resistant to garlic mustard."
> >
> > It certainly gives us a lot to think about in terms of wildlife
> > management.  At the same time, we wouldn't want to shrink the genetics
> of a
> > species, but there might be a balance.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:26 AM Kathy Daniel <kdaniel20816 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> https://news.uga.edu/coevolution-between-invasive-native-species-062812/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MAIPC mailing list
> >> MAIPC at lists.maipc.org
> >> http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > MAIPC mailing list
> > MAIPC at lists.maipc.org
> > http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20210903/eb2a100d/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> MAIPC mailing list
> MAIPC at lists.maipc.org
> http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of MAIPC Digest, Vol 119, Issue 4
> *************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20210905/37531b90/attachment.html>


More information about the MAIPC mailing list