[MAIPC] invasive plant removal

Richard Gardner rtgardner3 at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 10 11:23:29 PDT 2015


My feelings are that carrying out garlic mustard and Japanese stilt grass from places like the Appalachian Trail is not feasible.  We are doing a garlic mustard removal in early May along the AT near here.  With 14 miles of trail and no vehicle access along the stretch we will be doing I do not see taking out bags of garlic mustard as possible.  Instead, we will be leaving easily monitored piles as far apart as possible. Multiflora rose in our area is going extinct due to 2 diseases and a mite.  The bush honeysuckles are having serious issues here.  Part of my summer research will be to monitor and try to transfer the diseases between plants.  I will be looking for mites as the vector and trying to transfer aphids between plants.   I found that last fall when I tried to pull bush honeysuckles out they came without much effort.  We left the plants we pulled out in place with the roots exposed. Ailanthus altissima in on the list.  I am going to try to see if I can find a volunteer friendly way to transfer the diseases between trees.                                                                                               Richard Gardner
 
   

   From: Pia van de Venne <pia.parkprotector at gmail.com>
 To: maipc at lists.maipc.org 
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:37 AM
 Subject: [MAIPC] invasive plant removal
   
Hello,
During the 16 years that I have assisted in the removal of invasive plants, I learned that garlic mustard should be certainly taken out of the woods because of the amount of toxins in the plants. So we bag garlic mustard and most of the stiltgrass.
I do believe that none of the non native plant residue is beneficial to the native woods; we have masses of oak leaves and other native debris, so I just hope that piles of multiflora roses, burning bush, barberry, and honey suckle bush will decompose together with the native plant debris without causing too much harm or slowing down the growth. Our piles are 5ft tall and I lean on them to condense them.Since we have few volunteers we have left behind a lot of pulled out invasive material in the woods in piles.(They make very good bird and animal shelters.) I pay attention to not allow privet to touch the forest floor. We also compact the ground, disturbed by the digging and pulling, with our feet. I know that some people prefer to cut the stem and paint, but that is not the issue right now
My aim is to leave as much natural area between the piles to give native vegetation the right environment, since we still have tons of small saplings and herbaceous plants growing and exploding when we remove the invasive plants.Question: does it make a difference whether we make these concentrated piles or whether we just spread all the removed branches and roots of invasive bushes over the entire area.
Question: will planting new saplings between cut multiflora roses without removing or killing the roots make sense? Will the competition of the cut roots not prevent growing of the newly planted saplings?
Thank you very much for responding. Pia van de Venne, Volunteer coordinator Murrysville Parks 724 733 2770
_______________________________________________
MAIPC mailing list
MAIPC at lists.maipc.org
http://lists.maipc.org/listinfo.cgi/maipc-maipc.org


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.maipc.org/pipermail/maipc-maipc.org/attachments/20150410/f73fab84/attachment.htm>


More information about the MAIPC mailing list